Pain Management In Older Patients Research Articles

Development and psychometric assessment of barriers to postoperative pain management in dementia scale: A mixed methods exploratory study

Background: Identifying the barriers to acute pain management in older adults with dementia needs appropriate instruments adapted to the cultural structure of each community. Such an instrument can help to provide effective interventions. Objectives: This study aimed to develop and psychometrically validate Barriers to Postoperative Pain Management in Dementia Scale (BPPMDS) from the nurses' point of view. Methods: This methodological study was conducted in 2019–2020. In the first phase, semi-structured interviews with 15 nurses and literature review were conducted for item generation. In the second phase, face, content, and construct validity and reliability of the instrument were assessed. Results: In the first phase, 67 items were produced. In the second phase, the number of items reduced to 39 after the assessment of face, content, and construct validity. Exploratory factor analysis showed that the BPPMDS has three factors (i.e., older adult-related factors, health care provider-related factors, and system-related factors), which explain 57.57% of the total variance. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.956. Conclusions: The BPPMDS can be used as a valid and reliable scale to measure postoperative acute pain management in older patients with dementia and hip fracture.

Improving Effective Mental Health Consultation for Rural Older Adults Living With Depression and Pain: Learning From the Experiences of Rural Primary Care Physicians.

Novel approaches are needed to assist rural primary care physicians (PCPs) in caring for older patients living with depression and pain who are at an elevated suicide risk. To refine and improve a model of care (PREDICTOR: Pharmacy Identification and Primary Care Intervention of Older Adults at Risk for Suicide), we conducted qualitative interviews with rural PCPs about (1) caring for seniors with depression, pain, and suicidality and (2) their favored procedures for working with psychiatric consultants and the professional characteristics desired in an effective consultant. The study utilized a best-practice approach (including double coding) for qualitative interviews with 10 PCPs practicing in rural Pennsylvania. PCPs were interviewed about 3 themes related to caring for older adults with depression, pain, and suicidal ideation and working with psychiatric consultants. The study was conducted from January 2019 to May 2019. Four primary themes emerged from the interviews. (1) Rural PCPs become comfortable managing depression in older adults out of necessity, but desire collaboration on more complex mental health care. (2) Comorbid depression and pain are universally described as related through a vicious cycle in older adults. (3) Rural PCPs experience varying comfort with prescribing opioids for pain management in older patients, but most prefer not to prescribe opioids, and some refuse to do so. (4) PCPs endorsed the PREDICTOR remote consultation model as potentially beneficial to themselves and their older patients, but strongly desired that the consultant work with them as collaborators and for a collegial professional relationship with the mental health specialist. Rural PCPs are comfortable with remote consultation for older patients living with depression but desire collegial relationships with these consultants, supporting a collaborative approach. We describe explicit plans for implementing these findings as we refine PREDICTOR, in efforts to promote PCP practice change.

Older Patient Satisfaction with Chronic Pain Management in the National Geriatric Hospital in Vietnam.

PurposeThe high prevalence of chronic pain and difficulties in pain management in older people are challenging for healthcare providers globally. Patient satisfaction regarding pain management is one of the measures to assess efficacy of pain control as well as healthcare services. Thus, our study aimed to evaluate the older patients’ satisfaction with pain management and its associated factors in Vietnam.Patients and MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at National Geriatric Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam from May to October 2018. Face-to-face interviews were conducted on 495 older patients with chronic pain by using a structured questionnaire. The Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale (PTSS) was used to assess the level of satisfaction with pain management. A Tobit regression model was used to estimate factors associated with satisfaction toward pain management.ResultsThe mean total satisfaction score was 1.77 (SD= 0.22). Older patients were most satisfied with the aspect of side effects of pain relief medication (mean=0.66, SD=0.56). On the contrary, they were most dissatisfied with information provided about pain and its treatment and efficacy of pain relief medication. Outpatients were less satisfied with information provided, the impact of current medication and pain management in general compared to inpatients. The regression model showed that patients with severe pain tended to be more dissatisfied with pain management than those with no pain.ConclusionThis study indicated that the general satisfaction with chronic pain management in older patients was quite good especially in the aspect of pain medication’s side effects. However, dissatisfactory factors remained, including information provided about pain and efficacy of current pain medication. Intensive training regarding pain in geriatric care, health education communication for older people, and improved quality of medical services should be performed to ensure the quality of pain management, especially in the older population.

[Pain treatment in old age: special features and recommendations].

For geriatric patients with chronic pain, acomprehensive well-coordinated pain management is pivotal to ensure the best possible pain relief and to minimize as far as possible preventable negative side effects of treatment. Description of the difficulties in pain management of geriatric patients with respect to general basic rules that are worth paying attention to and presentation of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment options. This article describes the special features of pain management in older patients and gives recommendations on the use of analgesics and potential drug interactions in geriatric patients with organ dysfunction. Furthermore, individual substance groups are described with respect to their use in geriatric patients based on the recent literature. The aim of an individualized pain treatment in older and multimorbid patients is the relief of pain to an appropriate level, preservation of mobility, self-reliance and autonomy of each individual. The ability to participate in social activities as well as improvement in the quality of life need to be the focus of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment.

Emergency department pain management in older patients.

Emergency department pain management in older patients.

Psychometric Evaluation of the Pain Attitudes Questionnaire-Revised for People With Advanced Cancer.

This article presents the psychometric properties of a measure of 2 particular pain-related attitudes. The measure can help clarify whether these attitudes adversely influence pain reporting in older patients with advanced cancer as hypothesized and, in turn, explain the inadequate pain management frequently reported with this clinical group.

General Practitioners and Chronic Non-Malignant Pain Management in Older Patients: A Qualitative Study.

Chronic non-malignant pain (CNMP) is commonly managed by General Practitioners (GPs) in primary care. Analgesics are the mainstay of CNMP management in this setting. Selection of medications by GPs may be influenced by micro factors which are relevant to the practice setting, meso factors which relate to the local or regional environment or macro factors such as those arising from national or international influences. The aim of this study is to explore influences on GP practises in relation to pain management for older adults with CNMP. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 GPs. Transcripts were organised using the Framework Method of Data Management while an applied thematic analysis was used to identify the themes emerging from the data. Clinical considerations such as the efficacy of analgesics, adverse effects and co-morbidities strongly influence prescribing decisions. The GPs interviewed identified the lack of guidance on this subject in Ireland and described the impact of organisational and structural barriers of the Irish healthcare system on the management of CNMP. Changes in practice behaviours coupled with health system reforms are required to improve the quality and consistency of pharmacotherapeutic management of CNMP in primary care.

Use of Opioid Analgesics in Older Australians.

To identify potential medication management issues associated with opioid use in older Australians. Retrospective cross-sectional review of the utilization of analgesics in 19,581 people who underwent a medication review in Australia between 2010 and 2012. Australian residents living in the community deemed at risk for adverse medication outcomes or any resident living fulltime in an aged care facility. Patient characteristics in those taking regularly dosed opioids and not and those taking opioid doses >120 mg and ≤120 mg MEQ/day were compared. Multivariable binary logistic regression was used to analyze the association between regular opioid and high dose opioid usage and key variables. Additionally, medication management issues associated with opioids were identified. Opioids were taken by 31.8% of patients, with 22.1% taking them regularly. Several major medication management issues were identified. There was suboptimal use of multimodal analgesia, particularly a low use of non-opioid analgesics, in patients taking regular opioids. There was extensive use (45%) of concurrent anxiolytics/hypnotics among those taking regular opioid analgesics. Laxative use in those prescribed opioids regularly was low (60%). Additionally, almost 12% of patients were taking doses of opioid that exceeded Australian recommendations. A significant evidence to practice gap exists regarding the use of opioids amongst older Australians. These findings highlight the need for a quick reference guide to support prescribers in making appropriate decisions regarding pain management in older patients with persistent pain. This should also be combined with patient and caregiver education about the importance of regular acetaminophen to manage persistent pain.

Recognize Need for Pain Management in Older Patients

Recognize Need for Pain Management in Older Patients

Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for management of osteoarthritis in long-term care patients

Osteoarthritis is common in patients ≥65 years of age. Although nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are often prescribed for osteoarthritis pain, they pose age-related cardiovascular, renal, and gastrointestinal risks. Two topical NSAIDs, diclofenac sodium 1% gel (DSG) and diclofenac sodium 1.5% in 45.5% dimethylsulfoxide solution (D-DMSO), are approved in the US for the treatment of osteoarthritis pain. Topical NSAIDs have shown efficacy and safety in knee (DSG, D-DMSO) and hand (DSG) osteoarthritis. Analyses of data from randomized controlled trials of DSG in hand and knee osteoarthritis demonstrate significant improvement of pain and function in both younger patients (<65 years) and older patients (≥65 years) and suggest good safety and tolerability. However, long-term safety data in older patients are limited. Topical NSAIDs can ease medication administration and help address barriers to pain management in older patients, such as taking multiple medications and inability to swallow, and are a valuable option for long-term care providers.

Should Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) be Prescribed to the Older Adult?

The prevalence of chronic pain increases with age, exceeding 50% in individuals aged ≥65 years. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a mainstay of chronic pain management but carry significant dose-related risks of cardiovascular, renal, haematological and other systemic adverse events (AEs). Older patients have an increased risk of these AEs and are more likely to take multiple medications that can potentially interact with NSAIDs. In particular, older patients are more likely to have cardiovascular disease and a natural age-related decline in renal function, increasing the risks of cardiovascular, haematological and renal AEs. Given these risks, recent guidelines for the management of chronic pain in the elderly recommend using NSAIDs rarely and only in carefully selected patients. NSAIDs currently available in the US fall into three categories: nonselective NSAIDs that act via inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-1 and COX-2; celecoxib, a selective inhibitor of COX-2; and topical NSAIDs that inhibit both COX-1 and COX-2 but result in much less systemic NSAID exposure than oral formulations. Topical NSAIDs have demonstrated efficacy similar to oral NSAIDs, with an incidence of AEs similar to placebo; however, these agents are an option only in patients with localized pain in superficial joints. Safe pain management in older patients therefore requires cautious choice of selective and nonselective oral NSAIDs, topical NSAIDs or non-NSAID analgesics. This article discusses the risks and benefits of NSAID therapy, reviews its mechanism of action as the source of adverse effects and provides recommendations for maximizing NSAID safety, particularly in older patients. Articles cited in this review were identified via a search of PubMed (January 2005 to November 2009) and a manual search of reference lists from the articles identified in that search. Priority was given to articles discussing NSAID use in older populations, clinical trials of high quality, reports on NSAID safety and AEs, and treatment guidelines.

Documenting and implementing evidence-based post-operative pain management in older patients with hip fractures

Summary This study describes the type of pain assessment and management received by post-operative patients aged 65 years and over with a hip fracture. A retrospective audit of patients' medical records for the first five post-operative days was used. Forty-three medical records were audited at a large metropolitan hospital in Australia. Charts were eligible for auditing if the patient had a hip fracture surgically repaired and was over 65 years old. The documentation showed that nurses infrequently assessed pain and rarely used pain assessment tools. Pain interventions were pharmacological, with the most frequently administered analgesics being paracetamol (61.4%) and morphine (8.0%). Non-pharmacological interventions nor pain management education were documented. The findings of this study were similar to previous studies using other populations. It reinforced that nurses' documentation of pain assessment and management was insufficient and failed to contribute to continuity of care. It is recommended that a greater focus on acute pain is required by organizations if pain management is to improve. Feedback to nurses on their practice provides a starting point for practice development.

Effective pain management in older patients

Assessing and managing post-operative pain in older adult patients is complex. A baseline preoperative pain assessment provides the necessary data that assist appropriate and effective pain management. Careful monitoring and individualization of patient dosages result in effective older adult patient pain management.

Salicylate Toxicity in the Older Patient

Nonacetylated salicylates are frequently used in the treatment of musculoskeletal complaints and pain management in older patients because of their possible lower gastrointestinal and renal toxicity as compared with other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents. We report five patients with chronic salicylate intoxication seen at the Atlanta VA Medical Center. All charts of patients diagnosed with salicylate toxicity were reviewed, and cases with acute, intentional intoxication were excluded. In the study group, three patients took a nonacetylated salicylate, the other two took an acetylated salicylate. Our patients ranged in age from 51 to 78 years old. One patient died of respiratory failure and "sepsis-like syndrome," a potentially lethal complication of salicylate toxicity. Four of the patients had altered mental status as a presenting complaint. The presence of a combined respiratory alkalosis and metabolic acidosis, present in all five patients, was the clue for diagnosis in three of the cases. Tinnitus was reported in only one patient. A significantly decreased urate level and a wide anion gap were consistent findings as well. Two of the patients improved after hydration and discontinuation of use of the drug, two required alkalinization of the urine, and one required dialysis. Clinicians need to be more aware of the potential toxicity, including life-threatening complications, with the use of salicylates, particularly in high risk populations such as elderly patients and patients with multiple medical problems.